TIANLICHUJU — PERSONAL VERIFICATION WORKSHEET
An intimate Deco dining room without reflected glare
https://tianlichuju.com/journal/an-intimate-deco-dining-room-without-reflected-glare/

PROPOSED CHECKS — NO MEASURED RESULTS SUPPLIED
Date: __________________  Units: __________________
Room / product reference: __________________

1. Seat-specific reflected source
Where: At every occupied dining eye position facing the tabletop, mirror, glass, and polished metal.
Record: Number seats and map the source seen in each reflection, its active setting, and whether the effect changes when the diner moves normally.
Your observation: ______________________________________________
Interpretation: One comfortable viewpoint cannot establish a glare-free room, and subjective brightness is not a calibrated discomfort rating.
Alternative: Change source, shade, angle, or surface location one at a time before merely dimming every light.

2. Useful dimmed scene
Where: Across the fully set table and the serving route with intended secondary lights active.
Record: Note food visibility, faces, bright points, dark movement areas, and flicker or noise across the actual compatible control range.
Your observation: ______________________________________________
Interpretation: A low setting may hide one problem while creating another; the trial does not prove electrical compatibility beyond the installed products.
Alternative: Improve shielding or distribution and add appropriate room-edge light rather than accepting a dark route as the price of atmosphere.

3. Mirror's complete view
Where: From seated positions and the room entrance at the proposed mirror plane.
Record: Represent its full outline and record which lamps, service areas, and objects it would repeat; compare with a smaller or nonreflective alternative.
Your observation: ______________________________________________
Interpretation: The reflected composition is distinct from the beauty of the frame; a mock outline cannot reproduce all glass behavior.
Alternative: Relocate or omit the mirror when it doubles a distracting source or busy view that cannot otherwise be resolved.

PRACTICAL TRIAL
1. Include ordinary glassware and cutlery rather than testing an empty tabletop.
2. Ask to see the pendant lit before purchasing its decorative shell.
3. Compare a brushed finish sample under the actual source instead of assuming it removes all glare.

COMPARE THE SAME SCOPE
- Actual source distribution and seated reflections
- Compatible dimming and secondary lighting
- Mirror placement, surface care, and replaceable components
Cost drivers: Relocating fixed light sources; Replacing large reflective surfaces; Special access or proprietary lighting modules
Choose another route when: A highly reflective scheme is unsuitable when several occupied seats retain intrusive bright sources that cannot be resolved without making the meal and route too dark.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY
No glare index, light level, or dimming result has been measured. This is a proposed seated observation sequence, not a lighting-compliance assessment.

PHOTO REFERENCE
Rows of tables and chairs fill a broad dining interior, with ceiling lights repeated across the space.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Britannia_-_Dining_Room.jpg

DECISION CONDITIONS
choose: Choose the combination when faces, food, and serving remain clear from every occupied place and the limited reflective accents do not repeat intrusive sources toward diners.
alternative: Move or shield a source, reduce a mirror, or compare a less-polished finish before lowering all light and losing useful visibility around the table.
stop: Stop approving the scene from the entrance photograph alone when one seated view remains uncomfortable or component care and replacement cannot be sensibly performed.

PUBLISHED REFERENCES
CCOHS: Lighting Ergonomics Survey and Solutions
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/ergonomics/lighting/lighting_survey.html
CCOHS identifies polished surfaces, picture-frame glass, and screens as possible reflected-glare sources, distinct from direct glare. Its normal-position checks support tracing which light reaches a particular diner through a mirror or tabletop rather than judging the room only from its entrance.
Scope: Workplace glare guidance supplies diagnostic questions, not a measured rating, domestic light target, or certified result for the restaurant photograph.
Photographer: Otto Domes
Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Notes: ________________________________________________________